AI evolution outpaces regulation according to new Omdia report

LONDON, August 28, 2025: Analysis from Omdia’s new report AI Regulation: Analysis of Global Policies and Regulatory Frameworks reveals that governments and regulators worldwide are racing to address the rapidly evolving nature of AI technologies including generative AI, agentic AI, and sovereign AI systems. 

"The proliferation of AI is reshaping global regulatory frameworks faster than any previous technological wave," said Sarah McBride, Principal Analyst, Regulation, at Omdia. "What's particularly interesting is how policymakers are attempting to balance innovation with ethical considerations and sovereignty concerns." 

Key highlights from the report include:

• EU Sets Global Benchmark: The European Union issued the world’s first comprehensive AI regulatory framework, setting the benchmark for global standards. Since then, South Korea has issued the AI Basic Act.

• Strategic Government Investments: Nations are accelerating AI development through major funding initiatives, including the UK's AI Opportunities Action Plan which has attracted £14 billion ($17.6bn) in investment and the EU's €20 billion ($21bn) funding dedicated to building AI gigafactories.

• Sector- and Activity-Specific Approaches: Several countries are looking at adopting targeted regulatory frameworks for different industries or use cases rather than implementing one-size-fits-all solutions.

• Ethical Frameworks Take Priority: Governments are increasingly focused on developing ethical guidelines to govern AI deployment and maintaining technological sovereignty for national security and data governance reasons. These evolving standards aim to build public trust to drive acceptance and use of AI technologies.

• Regulatory Harmonization: The report recommends governments align AI regulations with existing legal frameworks to avoid stifling innovation. A key challenge is the potential overlap and contention between direct AI regulations, such as the EU’s AI Act, and broader legislative frameworks affecting digital markets.

• Seven Regulatory Challenges: Omdia’s analysis identifies seven key regulatory challenges that policymakers must address to effectively govern AI technologies (Figure 1).

The report also emphasizes that companies are actively seeking clearer regulatory boundaries.

"We're seeing a noteworthy shift where businesses are now calling for regulatory guidance to provide them with clear operational parameters," McBride noted. "This collaborative approach between public and private sectors could potentially lead to more balanced and effective regulatory frameworks and represents a maturation in the industry's approach to governance."

Omdia’s AI Regulation: Analysis of Global Policies and Regulatory Frameworks covers key regulatory challenges facing AI implementation and includes detailed comparison of regulatory approaches across different jurisdictions. It is part of a larger collection that includes in-depth case studies of regulatory approaches in nine major markets, providing valuable insights for policymakers and technology leaders navigating the complex AI regulatory landscape.