Omdia is part of Informa TechTarget

This website is owned and operated by Informa TechTarget, part of a global network that informs, influences and connects the world’s technology buyers and sellers. All copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. TechTarget, Inc.’s registered office is 275 Grove St. Newton, MA 02466.

header banner coverage

Post-GenAI hype: enterprises scrutinize AI budgets and raise the bar on results

December 10, 2024 | Eden Zoller

hand holding a globe with AI AdobeStock_939336513

Analyzing key insights from Omdia’s latest research, Chief Analyst Eden Zoller presents a compelling blog series that explores the evolving enterprise approach to AI. This series delves into critical trends shaping the AI landscape, offering a clear view of where business leaders stand in their adoption and strategic deployment of AI technologies. This first blog focuses on two foundational aspects of AI strategy: budgets and return on investment (ROI), shedding light on how organizations are aligning financial priorities with their AI ambitions.

Recent findings from Omdia’s 2024 AI Market Maturity Survey* reveal that enterprises remain optimistic about AI’s potential, with projects delivering measurable return on investment (ROI) for companies of all sizes. However, Omdia’s survey points to enterprises taking a more measured view of AI. This is partly a reaction to the hype around generative AI (GenAI), which is now abating with expectations being recalibrated. Enterprises are also becoming more experienced with AI– 46% of survey respondents are scaling AI or ramping up live deployments. Greater experience with AI leads to realistic view of AI capabilities. The bottom line is that AI budgets, and particularly those for generative AI, are under even more scrutiny and hard won. Enterprises are taking a laser focus on ROI and will demand more of vendors and what their solutions can deliver. 

Twenty-six percent of survey respondents report that AI projects have improved customer experience/services, while 21% report improvements in efficiency/automation. The impact of AI projects on top-line revenue and bottom-line costs is less intense but still significant at 16% and 15%, respectively. The ability of AI to improve top-line revenue and reduce bottom-line costs is consequential, as it affects a company’s financial performance, with positive impacts on financial results via stronger profitability and improved shareholder value. Moreover, the survey suggests that enterprises of all sizes are experiencing ROI from AI. 

The survey also reveals that that AI at scale intensifies the positive effects AI has on key business objectives as well as ROI. For example, 45% of enterprises scaling AI report improvements to customer experience/services of more than 11%, rising to 61% for those enterprises scaling GenAI. ROI reports of this kind will prompt more enterprises to ramp up AI deployments, increasing the need for scalable infrastructure, sophisticated AI platforms, and tools for development, testing, and deployment. 

AI metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) play a critical role in determining and supporting AI ROI because they provide the measurable evidence needed to evaluate the success of AI initiatives. AI metrics/KPIs can also help with budget and resource optimization, for example, by identifying which AI applications are performing well and which are not. Another useful aspect of AI metrics/KPIs is for supporting quality assurance, for instance, monitoring AI metrics for a model, system, or application can help identify performance degradation. Seventy-seven percent of enterprises in the survey have metrics/KPIs in place to assess AI performance, which is positive. However, only a third of those apply AI metrics to all AI use cases, with the majority (42%) adopting an ad hoc approach where AI metrics are only applied to selected use cases. Almost a quarter of respondents have no AI metrics in place at all. It could be that certain enterprises lack the expertise needed to quantify AI impacts, which can be difficult due to attribution (among other things). In this scenario, enterprises should seek outside support from, for example, vendors that provide AI performance management tools and/or AI impact analytics platforms and similar.

Compared to the 2023 survey, the 2024 iteration shows that budgets of more than $1m have contracted or remain stable, while budgets of less than $1m have grown. This is most pronounced in the $50,000–$249,000 budget band, with a year-on-year increase of 8%. The emphasis on budgets of below $1m could reflect more measured expectations regarding AI now that the hype surrounding GenAI is cooling. Budgets are likely to be tempered by ongoing economic uncertainty and constrictions in many markets, compounded by political instability that has global ramifications. It should also be kept in mind that while more enterprises in the 2024 survey are scaling AI than ever before, many are still at much earlier phases of AI deployment, split between those enterprises still investing AI technology and use cases (27%), and those piloting AI (27%). Of these respondents, the majority are smaller enterprises with budgets below $250 million. For companies in this position, ROI from AI is still unproven and pushing for punchy AI budgets is difficult. Vendors are understandably drawn to enterprises with substantial AI budgets, but an exclusive focus on the big spenders means missed opportunities. Many enterprises with modest budgets will find success with AI and grow, which makes winning their business and trust a worthwhile pursuit. Enterprises with more constrained AI budgets will need flexible pricing models, such as subscription-based models, lower initial costs, and/or consumption-based pricing, to reduce barriers to entry.

While software remains the focal point of AI budgets in 2024 (ranked as the first or second budget priority by 55% of respondents), attention is turning to AI compute infrastructure (ranked as first or second budget priority by 45% of respondents) and investing in in-house personnel (ranked as first or second by 41% of respondents). The importance of directing spend on compute infrastructure is intriguing given that survey responds prefer external, commercial AI solutions (38%). However, 35% of enterprises in the survey are using mixed solutions while 28% are developing AI solutions in-house. For enterprises in latter scenarios, allocating budget to compute hardware is a strategic investment. 

Looking ahead, enterprises remain confident that AI will deliver positive results towards business goals in the next 12-24 months, with 44% saying they are very confident AI can do this. When it comes to AI budgets for 2025, 87% of enterprises predict they will grow relative to 2024; and of those, the majority expect increases of between 1 and 10% (31%) and between 11 and 25% (28%). 

* The Omdia 2024 AI Market Maturity Survey was completed in August 2024 among 478 enterprises from across the major global regions, key industry verticals, and companies of different sizes based on revenue.

Further reading

AI Market Maturity 2024 Survey: Data Tool (October 2024)
2024 AI Market Maturity Survey Analysis: Budgets and ROI (November 2024)

 

 
More from author
Eden Zoller
Chief Analyst, Applied AI

Eden has been immersed in digital media services and tech for over 20 years, focusing on strategy, innovation, monetization, and future trends. Eden’s primary focus is applied AI, specializing in generative AI, AI impacts on consumer services and industry verticals, responsible AI, and AI governance. Initiatives driven by Eden include the development of Omdia’s AI Maturity Assessment tool, a Big Tech Benchmark, an AI Innovation Tracker, Omdia’s rolling consumer AI survey program, an ongoing assessment of AI impacts across key verticals including games, TV & video, and commerce. Eden manages workshops and consultancy projects in the above areas, providing tailored advice and market intelligence.


Eden is a frequent media commentator and speaker at industry events, is a long-standing judge for the GSMA’s Global Mobile Awards, is an independent advisory board member for AI4ME, and is studying for a Masters in AI ethics at the University of Cambridge. Before her career as an analyst, Eden was a journalist and editor for a string of respected industry publications.


More from author
assess banner

Register here for full complimentary research reports and content.

Get ahead in your business and receive industry insider news, findings and trends from Omdia analysts.

Register
More from our experts View All
Let's Connect

More insights

Assess the marketplace with our extensive insights collection.

More insights

Hear from analysts

When you partner with Omdia, you gain access to our highly rated Ask An Analyst service.

Hear from analysts

Omdia Newsroom

Read the latest press releases from Omdia.

Omdia Newsroom

Solutions

Leverage unique access to market leading analysts and profit from their deep industry expertise.

Solutions
Person holding infinity symbol Contact us infinity symbol
Did you find what you were looking for?

If you require further assistance, contact us with your questions or email our customer success team.

Contact us